| |
RECENT CASES |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
GENERAL INFORMATION |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
FDA: Vioxx Recall (rofecoxib) Questions and Answers |
|
| FAQ -- Frequently asked questions (and answers)
from the Food and Drug Administration relating
to Vioxx (rofecoxib), Vioxx injuries and lawsuits
and the Vioxx recall. |
| |
| 1. What action
did Merck take on September 30, 2004? |
Merck
announced a voluntary worldwide withdrawal
of Vioxx (rofecoxib). |
| |
| 2. What is Vioxx? |
Vioxx
is a COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drug (NSAID). Vioxx is also related to the
nonselective NSAIDs , such as ibuprofen and
naproxen. Vioxx is a prescription medicine
used to relieve signs and symptoms of arthritis,
acute pain in adults, and painful menstrual
cycles. |
| |
| 3. Did the FDA require
this action? |
No,
Merck made this decision independent of input
from FDA. The Agency has not had an opportunity
to review the data from the study that was stopped
in the depth that Merck has, but agrees with
the company that there appear to be significant
safety concerns for patients, particularly those
taking the drug chronically.
FDA plans to work closely
with Merck to coordinate the withdrawal of this product from the US market. |
| |
| 4. What action
did FDA take on September 30, 2004? |
FDA
issued a public health advisory concerning the
use of Vioxx. This advisory is based on Merck & Co.,
Inc. voluntarily withdrawing Vioxx from the market
due to safety concerns. |
| |
| 5. What should I do
if I am currently taking Vioxx? |
The
risk that an individual patient will suffer a
heart attack or stroke related to Vioxx is very
small. We encourage people taking Vioxx to contact
their physician to discuss discontinuing use
of Vioxx and alternative treatments. Any decision
about which drug product to take to treat your
symptoms should be made in consultation with
your physician based on an assessment of your
specific treatment needs. |
| |
| 6. What are the likely
long-term health effects, if any, of taking this
product? |
The
new study shows that Vioxx may cause an increased
risk in cardiovascular events such as heart attack
and strokes during chronic use. |
| |
| 7. What evidence supports
the Public Health Advisory? |
Merck's
decision to withdraw Vioxx from the market is
based on new data from a trial called the APPROVe
[ Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on VIOXX] trial.
In the APPROVe trial, Vioxx was compared to placebo
(sugar-pill). The purpose of the trial was to
see if Vioxx 25 mg was effective in preventing
the recurrence of colon polyps. This trial was
stopped early because there was an increased
risk for serious cardiovascular events, such
as heart attacks and strokes, first observed
after 18 months of continuous treatment with
Vioxx compared with placebo. |
| |
| 8. Why wasnt the
APPROVe trial stopped earlier? |
The
APPROVe trial began enrollment in 2000. The trial
was being monitored by an independent data safety
monitoring board (DSMB). It was not stopped earlier
because the results for the first 18 months of
the trial did not show any increased risk of
confirmed cardiovascular events on Vioxx. |
| |
| 9. What did FDA know
about the risk of heart attack and stroke when
it approved Vioxx? |
The
FDA originally approved Vioxx in May 1999. The
original safety database included approximately
5000 patients on Vioxx and did not show an increased
risk of heart attack or stroke. A later study,
VIGOR (VIOXX GI Outcomes Research), was primarily
designed to look at the effects of Vioxx on side
effects such as stomach ulcers and bleeding and
was submitted to the FDA in June 2000. The study
showed that patients taking Vioxx had fewer stomach
ulcers and bleeding than patients taking naproxen,
another NSAID, however, the study also showed
a greater number of heart attacks in patients
taking Vioxx. The VIGOR study was discussed at
a February 2001 Arthritis Advisory Committee
and the new safety information from this study
was added to the labeling for Vioxx in April
2002. Merck then began to conduct longer-term
trials to obtain more data on the risk for heart
attack and stroke with chronic use of Vioxx. |
| |
| 10. Is FDAs expedited
review process putting riskier drugs on the market? |
No.
Vioxx received a six-month priority review because
the drug potentially provided a significant therapeutic
advantage over existing approved drugs due to
fewer gastrointestinal side effects, including
bleeding. A product undergoing a priority review
is held to the same rigorous standards for safety,
efficacy, and quality that FDA expects from all
drugs submitted for approval. |
| |
| 11. What other drugs
are similar to Vioxx? |
Vioxx
is a COX-2 selective, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drug (NSAID). Other COX-2 selective NSAIDs on
the market at this time are Celebrex (celecoxib)
and Bextra (valdecoxib). Vioxx is also related
to the nonselective NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen
and naproxen. You should consult your physician
to determine which treatment is right for you. |
| |
| 12. Does todays action
suggest that other drugs in the same class are
dangerous? |
The
results of clinical studies with one drug in
a given class do not necessarily apply to other
drugs in the same class. All of the NSAIDs have
risks when taken chronically, especially of gastrointestinal
(stomach) bleeding, but also liver and kidney
toxicity. Patients using these drugs for a long
period of time (longer than two weeks) should
be under the care of a physician. |
| |
| 13. Will Vioxx be recalled? |
FDA
did not request a recall of Vioxx. This product
is being voluntarily withdrawn from the market
by Merck. |
| |
| 14. Can my pharmacist continue
to fill my prescription for Vioxx? |
No,
Merck is initiating a market withdrawal in the
United States to the pharmacy level. This means
Vioxx will no longer be available at pharmacies. |
| |
| 15. How can I report
a serious side effect with Vioxx to FDA? |
The
FDA encourages anyone aware of a serious adverse
reaction to make a MedWatch report. You can report
an adverse event in two ways:
|
|
| 16. Where can I get
more information? |
To find out more
about Vioxx from the FDA:
Visit the Drug Information web page at: www.fda.gov/cder,
or call Drug Information at: 888-INFO-FDA (888-463-6332). |
|
| Founded in 1972, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is an over
fifty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco,
New York and Nashville. For the
last five years, the National Law Journal has
recognized Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs'
law firms in America. |
| For our personal injury
cases, we bring a team of experienced lawyers.
Each client is assigned a partner and an associate.
In addition, we have on staff multiple nurses,
legal assistants, scientific analysts and case
clerks to assist the attorneys. |
| We have represented thousands
of patients who ingested prescription drugs with
dangerous undisclosed side effects, and patients
who received defective medical devices in personal
injury lawsuits across America, including residents
of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California,
Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan,
Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North
Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New
Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee,
Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin,
West Virginia and Wyoming. |
| We look forward to communicating
with you and answering any questions you may have.
To learn more about the competitive advantages
our firm offers clients in personal injury and
products liability cases, click
here. |
| Lieff Cabraser attorneys
provide legal advice and practice law for clients
in federal district courts throughout the United
States and in state courts where we are licensed
to practice. In states in which our lawyers are
not licensed to practice, we have affiliations
with local attorneys who serve as co-counsel with
our firm. Please read our Disclaimer. |
| Persons seeking to preserve
any potential legal claims for allegedly dangerous
and/or defective products should contact an attorney
promptly because all states have mandatory time
periods (called "statutes of limitation")
within which lawsuits must be filed. Otherwise,
a person's claims may be forever barred. In some
states, the statute of limitations period for filing
personal injury claims is only one year from the
date of injury. |
|
|
| Trademark
Notice: Personal Injury Lawyer America is an electronic newsletter
from Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP. Lieff Cabraser
represents clients in a wide range of cases, including personal
injury and wrongful
death lawsuits. Our personal injury attorneys
| lawyers are committed to providing the very best representation
and support possible for our clients. This website provides information
on the legal rights of the injured and the latest news on product
defects and related lawsuits. |
Lieff Cabraser
is not affiliated in any way with any trademark owner. The use of
any trademarks on this site is for product identification and information
purposes only.
About Lieff Cabraser: We have
offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. Our lawyers have
represented clients in personal injury, wrongful death and
rollover crashes and product defect lawsuits across America, including
residents of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California,
Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho,
Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland,
Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North
Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada,
New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South
Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin,
West Virginia and Wyoming.
Among the cases our personal injury
attorneys are prosecuting are the Medtronic heart lead recall, the
AMO contact lens solution recall, the Peter Pan peanut butter recall, Guidant
pacemaker defects, SUV
rollover accidents, popcorn
workers lung injuries, and Ford
switch fires.
Disclaimer: The hiring of legal
professionals is an important decision that should not be based on
advertising alone. Please read our disclaimer. |
|
| Copyright © 2008 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP |
|
|
|