Personal Injury Lawyer America.com - A newsletter from the national law firm of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
Home button
Find a case
About Our Firm button
Contact us
SEARCH  
shim
  RECENT CASES  
   
  Complete list of all cases  
   
  GENERAL INFORMATION  
   
  Send us an email  
     
 

FDA: Vioxx Recall (rofecoxib) Questions and Answers

FAQ -- Frequently asked questions (and answers) from the Food and Drug Administration relating to Vioxx (rofecoxib), Vioxx injuries and lawsuits and the Vioxx recall.
  1. What action did Merck take on September 30, 2004?
  2. What is Vioxx?
  3. Did FDA require this action?
  4. What action did FDA take on September 30, 2004?
  5. What should I do if I am currently taking Vioxx?
  6. What are the likely long-term health effects, if any, of taking this product?
  7. What evidence supports the Public Health Advisory?
  8. Why wasn’t the APPROVe trial stopped earlier?
  9. What did FDA know about the risk of heart attack and stroke when it approved Vioxx?
  10. Is the FDA's expedited review process putting riskier drugs on the market?
  11. What other drugs are similar to Vioxx?
  12. Does today’s action suggest that other drugs in the same class are dangerous?
  13. Will Vioxx be recalled?
  14. Can my pharmacist continue to fill my prescription for Vioxx?
  15. How can I report a serious side effect with Vioxx to FDA?
  16. Where can I get more information?
 
Vioxx bottles
Vioxx recall and Vioxx side effects lawsuits
Vioxx Dangers & Lawsuits Timeline
Timeline of events in the Vioxx recall and litigation

FDA Resources & Advisories
Vioxx warning letters and Vioxx advisories from the FDA

Vioxx Lawsuits
Information on Vioxx injury lawsuits

FDA Q&A on Vioxx
Questions & Answers about Vioxx from the FDA
 
1.  What action did Merck take on September 30, 2004?
          Merck announced a voluntary worldwide withdrawal of Vioxx (rofecoxib).
  
2. What is Vioxx?
          Vioxx is a COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Vioxx is also related to the nonselective NSAIDs , such as ibuprofen and naproxen. Vioxx is a prescription medicine used to relieve signs and symptoms of arthritis, acute pain in adults, and painful menstrual cycles.
  
3.  Did the FDA require this action?
          No, Merck made this decision independent of input from FDA. The Agency has not had an opportunity to review the data from the study that was stopped in the depth that Merck has, but agrees with the company that there appear to be significant safety concerns for patients, particularly those taking the drug chronically.
          FDA plans to work closely with Merck to coordinate the withdrawal of this product from the US market.         
          
4.  What action did FDA take on September 30, 2004?
          FDA issued a public health advisory concerning the use of Vioxx. This advisory is based on Merck & Co., Inc. voluntarily withdrawing Vioxx from the market due to safety concerns.
         
5.  What should I do if I am currently taking Vioxx?
          The risk that an individual patient will suffer a heart attack or stroke related to Vioxx is very small. We encourage people taking Vioxx to contact their physician to discuss discontinuing use of Vioxx and alternative treatments. Any decision about which drug product to take to treat your symptoms should be made in consultation with your physician based on an assessment of your specific treatment needs.
          
6.  What are the likely long-term health effects, if any, of taking this product?
          The new study shows that Vioxx may cause an increased risk in cardiovascular events such as heart attack and strokes during chronic use.
          
7.  What evidence supports the Public Health Advisory?
          Merck's decision to withdraw Vioxx from the market is based on new data from a trial called the APPROVe [ Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on VIOXX] trial. In the APPROVe trial, Vioxx was compared to placebo (sugar-pill). The purpose of the trial was to see if Vioxx 25 mg was effective in preventing the recurrence of colon polyps. This trial was stopped early because there was an increased risk for serious cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks and strokes, first observed after 18 months of continuous treatment with Vioxx compared with placebo.
          
8.  Why wasn’t the APPROVe trial stopped earlier?          
          The APPROVe trial began enrollment in 2000. The trial was being monitored by an independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB). It was not stopped earlier because the results for the first 18 months of the trial did not show any increased risk of confirmed cardiovascular events on Vioxx.
          
9.  What did FDA know about the risk of heart attack and stroke when it approved Vioxx?
          The FDA originally approved Vioxx in May 1999. The original safety database included approximately 5000 patients on Vioxx and did not show an increased risk of heart attack or stroke. A later study, VIGOR (VIOXX GI Outcomes Research), was primarily designed to look at the effects of Vioxx on side effects such as stomach ulcers and bleeding and was submitted to the FDA in June 2000. The study showed that patients taking Vioxx had fewer stomach ulcers and bleeding than patients taking naproxen, another NSAID, however, the study also showed a greater number of heart attacks in patients taking Vioxx. The VIGOR study was discussed at a February 2001 Arthritis Advisory Committee and the new safety information from this study was added to the labeling for Vioxx in April 2002. Merck then began to conduct longer-term trials to obtain more data on the risk for heart attack and stroke with chronic use of Vioxx.
          
10.  Is FDA’s expedited review process putting riskier drugs on the market?
          No. Vioxx received a six-month priority review because the drug potentially provided a significant therapeutic advantage over existing approved drugs due to fewer gastrointestinal side effects, including bleeding. A product undergoing a priority review is held to the same rigorous standards for safety, efficacy, and quality that FDA expects from all drugs submitted for approval.
          
11.  What other drugs are similar to Vioxx?
          Vioxx is a COX-2 selective, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Other COX-2 selective NSAIDs on the market at this time are Celebrex (celecoxib) and Bextra (valdecoxib). Vioxx is also related to the nonselective NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen and naproxen. You should consult your physician to determine which treatment is right for you.
          
12. Does today’s action suggest that other drugs in the same class are dangerous?
          The results of clinical studies with one drug in a given class do not necessarily apply to other drugs in the same class. All of the NSAIDs have risks when taken chronically, especially of gastrointestinal (stomach) bleeding, but also liver and kidney toxicity. Patients using these drugs for a long period of time (longer than two weeks) should be under the care of a physician.
          
13.  Will Vioxx be recalled?
          FDA did not request a recall of Vioxx. This product is being voluntarily withdrawn from the market by Merck.
          
14. Can my pharmacist continue to fill my prescription for Vioxx?
          No, Merck is initiating a market withdrawal in the United States to the pharmacy level. This means Vioxx will no longer be available at pharmacies.
          
15.  How can I report a serious side effect with Vioxx to FDA?
          The FDA encourages anyone aware of a serious adverse reaction to make a MedWatch report. You can report an adverse event in two ways:
 
16.  Where can I get more information?
To find out more about Vioxx from the FDA:
Visit the Drug Information web page at: www.fda.gov/cder, or call Drug Information at: 888-INFO-FDA (888-463-6332).

Lieff Cabraser: Experienced Product Liability Injury Lawyers
Founded in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is an over fifty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. For the last five years, the National Law Journal has recognized Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs' law firms in America.
For our personal injury cases, we bring a team of experienced lawyers. Each client is assigned a partner and an associate. In addition, we have on staff multiple nurses, legal assistants, scientific analysts and case clerks to assist the attorneys.
We have represented thousands of patients who ingested prescription drugs with dangerous undisclosed side effects, and patients who received defective medical devices in personal injury lawsuits across America, including residents of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming.
We look forward to communicating with you and answering any questions you may have. To learn more about the competitive advantages our firm offers clients in personal injury and products liability cases, click here.
Notice on Practice and Statute of Limitations
Lieff Cabraser attorneys provide legal advice and practice law for clients in federal district courts throughout the United States and in state courts where we are licensed to practice. In states in which our lawyers are not licensed to practice, we have affiliations with local attorneys who serve as co-counsel with our firm. Please read our Disclaimer.
Persons seeking to preserve any potential legal claims for allegedly dangerous and/or defective products should contact an attorney promptly because all states have mandatory time periods (called "statutes of limitation") within which lawsuits must be filed. Otherwise, a person's claims may be forever barred. In some states, the statute of limitations period for filing personal injury claims is only one year from the date of injury.
     Trademark Notice: Personal Injury Lawyer America is an electronic newsletter from Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP. Lieff Cabraser represents clients in a wide range of cases, including personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits. Our personal injury attorneys | lawyers are committed to providing the very best representation and support possible for our clients. This website provides information on the legal rights of the injured and the latest news on product defects and related lawsuits.
     Lieff Cabraser is not affiliated in any way with any trademark owner. The use of any trademarks on this site is for product identification and information purposes only.
     About Lieff Cabraser: We have offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. Our lawyers have represented clients in personal injury, wrongful death and rollover crashes and product defect lawsuits across America, including residents of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming.
     Among the cases our personal injury attorneys are prosecuting are the Medtronic heart lead recall, the AMO contact lens solution recall, the Peter Pan peanut butter recall, Guidant pacemaker defects, SUV rollover accidents, popcorn workers lung injuries, and Ford switch fires.
     Disclaimer: The hiring of legal professionals is an important decision that should not be based on advertising alone. Please read our disclaimer.
Copyright © 2008 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Read our Personal Injury Law brochure